Danny Ayalon on who is to blame for Gaza

Aljazeera: Read the full transcript of our discussion with the Former Israeli Deputy FM about Gaza and Israel’s nuclear programme. 09 Jan 2019

Audience participant 3: Based here, I’ve been here for a couple of years.

Mehdi Hasan: Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Danny Ayalon. Currently, he heads “The Truth about Israel”, a Zionist advocacy organisation. Thank you for coming.
Danny Ayalon: Thank you, thank you very much.
Mehdi Hasan: Danny Ayalon, on May 14th of this year, the Israeli government celebrated the 70th anniversary of your country’s independence at the opening of the new US embassy in Jerusalem, I believe you were there as well, at that event, while over in Gaza on that same day Israeli army snipers killed 62 Palestinians in cold blood, gunned them down in full view of the world’s television cameras. How do you justify, can you justify, the killing of unarmed Palestinian protesters, journalists, paramedics, kids?
Danny Ayalon: Well Mehdi, no one can justify killing innocent people, but I’m not sure this was the case, the 14th of May there were -, you’re right, 62 persons were killed, they were pushed by their leaders of the Hamas, who by the way want to destroy the state of Israel, they were using them as human shields as some of them were behind them with bombs, incendiary, Molotov and other things. By the way, the 62, Hamas itself confessed the second day that out of the 62, 50 were active Hamas members. All the rest, well, I mean, we call it in, in a way which I don’t like “collateral damage”, but we have to look at who is responsible for the death, and the responsible is only Hamas.
Mehdi Hasan: Here’s a question to you; 143 Palestinians at least, and the count keeps changing because Israelis keep killing more, have died since March 30th, since the beginning of the so-called “Great March of Return”. Fifteen thousand Palestinians, let’s just be clear, 15,000 have been wounded, 4,000 of them according to the United Nations were shot with live ammunition. Are you telling us, are you telling the Oxford Union audience here, the audience at home, that those 15,000 people were all members of Hamas? Seriously?
Danny Ayalon: Mehdi Hasan, I can look at anyone here in their eyes and say Israel is doing its level best not to kill anyone who is not involved. It’s very important to know who is responsible here, because -.
Mehdi Hasan: Is it not the-, is it not the responsibility of the people pulling the trigger? That’s normally how you hold people responsible for someone being killed.
Danny Ayalon: No. Well -, well -, well, how do you define pulling the trigger?
Mehdi Hasan: Um -.
Danny Ayalon: If you have the Hamas people -.
Mehdi Hasan: A man with a gun -.
Danny Ayalon: Yeah -.
Mehdi Hasan: Aims at a child from a 150 metres away and shoots him in the head.
Danny Ayalon: What about -, what about Palestinian terrorists were hiding behind innocent people who are launching rockets. Who are launching rockets!
Mehdi Hasan: OK, well it -, well it’s a simple question. 15,000 wounded, how many of them were either members of Hamas, slash, terrorists?
Danny Ayalon: I do not know. I know that from the 62 on the 14th of May, 50 were Hamas by their own admission. On the other -.
Mehdi Hasan: No, we don’t know that because there hasn’t been an investigation.
Danny Ayalon: The facts are (overtalking) no -.
Mehdi Hasan: You got their Hamas membership forms from their bodies? What -, what’s the facts?
Danny Ayalon: No. The facts are -, the facts are that Hamas leadership, sometimes at gunpoint, are sending those poor Hamas -, th -, those poor Gazan people to the borders. Now, [what is this] -.
Mehdi Hasan: What evidence for that? The UN doesn’t say that; human rights groups don’t say that.
Mehdi Hasan: Let’s come back to the -, the shootings here. Even if they were all members of Hamas, even if all 15,000 people are, you do realise that under international law and basic morality you can’t shoot people for being members of a group, no matter what group it is. You can only shoot them when they pose an imminent threat to you. Were 15,000 people posing an imminent threat to Israeli snipers?
Danny Ayalon: Yes, they were. Yes, they were.
Mehdi Hasan: OK.
Danny Ayalon: And I’ll tell you how, I’ll tell you how. First of all, not to the Israeli snipers but certainly to the Israeli kids and babies and women and men who live in their own territory. Hamas is sending their people, it’s not just demonstration -,
Mehdi Hasan: Countless Palestinians at the protest have been interviewed and they said, “We weren’t sent by Hamas.”
Danny Ayalon: Just go into the blogs -.
Mehdi Hasan: But they’re all liars, are they?
Danny Ayalon: Just go to the blogs of Hamas where they say, “The Jews are sons of pigs and sons of dogs, and they have a -.”
Mehdi Hasan: And you’re now quoting them as a reliable source, that’s my favourite -.
Danny Ayalon: No!
Mehdi Hasan: I’ve interviewed so many Israelis, you’re the first to come here and say -.
Danny Ayalon: No!
Mehdi Hasan: “My source is Hamas.” The first.
Danny Ayalon: Of course, it -.
Mehdi Hasan: In 10 years of doing this.
Danny Ayalon: Of course, it is.
Mehdi Hasan: Wow.
Danny Ayalon: Because all you have to do is to see what they say. I -, I just -.
Mehdi Hasan: Well no, how about we look at -, how about we look at some facts rather than your -, your kind of dodgy blogs?
Danny Ayalon: I just quote Hamas.
Mehdi Hasan: Let’s -, let me ask you this. Well, look, I’ll just quote the people who died and their family members. What threat did Razan al-Najjar, 21-year-old volunteer paramedic who was shot while wearing a white uniform in the chest, a hundred meters away from the fence, what threat did she pose to Israeli snipers?
Danny Ayalon: Wait a minute. This is something I really looked into, OK? She -.
Mehdi Hasan: I’m glad someone did.
Danny Ayalon: Yes. She was having an incendiary bomb, and there is an investigation by the IDF, so she was a threat. But I have another questions for you; why -.
Mehdi Hasan: Where’s your -, hold on, no, no, before -.
Danny Ayalon: Why was she -, why was she going into a-, it’s a warzone!
Mehdi Hasan: Why? You know why she was going, because you’re killing her people and she’s a paramedic.
Mehdi Hasan: Can you tell me how many Israelis were killed by Palestinian protesters since March the 30th? Simple question.
Danny Ayalon: You know, again, I didn’t check it but, you know -.
Mehdi Hasan: Zero. But you are the ones under threat.
Danny Ayalon: No, no, no. I want to a -, why is it that no Israeli was killed? ‘Cause the Israeli government, elected democratically, is defending them. Hamas people, not defending the people -.
Mehdi Hasan: Palestinians don’t get a right to self-defence, do they?
Danny Ayalon: No, no, no, they are sending them to die.
Danny Ayalon: Listen, it’s a culture of death.
Mehdi Hasan: You keep saying they were sent to their death -.
Danny Ayalon: Yes.
Mehdi Hasan: As if Israelis have no agency. You were forced to pull the trigger. You just shot them because Hamas whispered in your ears to shoot them.
Danny Ayalon: No.
Mehdi Hasan: You could choose not to kill people at a fence who are just damaging a fence allegedly, as the UN, the EU, international lawyers have said. No other country shoots people in this way, in the back as they’re running away.
Danny Ayalon: Mehdi Hasan, I’m sorry if I show some impatience, but it’s not a human rights situation. It’s an area in conflict. It’s an armed conflict, absolutely!
Mehdi Hasan: [Oh I see,] it’s a warzone, there’s no human rights, you could do whatever you want!
Danny Ayalon: Well, there is -, there is -.
Mehdi Hasan: Is that what Israel’s position is?
Danny Ayalon: There is laws of [war] -.
Mehdi Hasan: Shoot people in the back, shoot nurses, shoot kids.
Danny Ayalon: Listen, listen -.
Mehdi Hasan: Shoot journalists.
Danny Ayalon: I’ll ask -, you have a border, you have thousands of people stampeding over to your borders with knives in their hands, with bombs, and you know that you have kindergartens, you have schools, [you have to save] people.
Mehdi Hasan: Journalists and eye-witnesses say there were not thousands of people with bombs, that is a false statement Danny and you know it.
Danny Ayalon: Out of these thousands, it’s enough that one has a bomb, but -, but more -.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, I’m glad you’ve gone from thousands to one.
Danny Ayalon: But -, no, no! I -, no.
Mehdi Hasan: Good, we’re getting somewhere.
Danny Ayalon: No, you’re putting words in my mouth.
Mehdi Hasan: I’m putting your own words in your own mouth.
Danny Ayalon: No, you’re not.
Mehdi Hasan: You said thousands went with knives -.
Danny Ayalon: No, no.
Mehdi Hasan: I’m saying that’s not true. Do you stand by that statement? Do you stand by that statement?
Danny Ayalon: You know what, I stand -, I -, I said something else. I said even if there was one, there were thousand but even if there was one I say you are wrong. So please -.
Mehdi Hasan: You say -, you say this 21-year-old nurse, Razan al-Najjar had a bomb. No evidence of that, eye-witnesses say not true.
Danny Ayalon: Well, it is still under investigation. By the way -.
Mehdi Hasan: There’s videos of her holding her hands up.
Mehdi Hasan: Let me ask you this; Yasser Murtaja, journalist, 30 years old, shot in the stomach by an Israeli sniper. He was 250 metres away from the fence. Why was he -, why was he -, what knife did he have? What knife was he carrying?
Danny Ayalon: Mehdi, you can quote hundreds of names, if you look at them individually, I feel bad for them and for their families, even if they were coming to harm us.
Mehdi Hasan: I’m not asking you to feel bad, I’m asking how do you justify killing -.
Danny Ayalon: I say because -, because -, because they came with a -, a harm intention. If they were coming -.
Mehdi Hasan: Where’s your proof of that?
Mehdi Hasan: Yasser [al-] Murtaja was not Hamas, was a journalist, you shot him in the stomach, your country shot him in the stomach, he -, and you claim he had a hurtful intention. That’s an outrageous claim to make of someone who’s dead without any evidence. That’s literally smearing the dead.
Danny Ayalon: No, anyone who goes into a warzone knows exactly what he’s doing. They’re -, they’re -.
Mehdi Hasan: What is a warzone?
Danny Ayalon: When they come and attack us, it’s a warzone.
Mehdi Hasan: He wasn’t attacking you.
Mehdi Hasan: If you pull a gun, you aim at someone and you shoot them. Remember the Israeli military bragged on Twitter, “We know where every bullet landed.”
Danny Ayalon: Mehdi, you go around a circle to the same point, and the point is that we have a border -.
Mehdi Hasan: You don’t have a border.
Danny Ayalon: A legitimate border, well they tried to cross it -.
Mehdi Hasan: You don’t have a border, Danny.
Danny Ayalon: Not with flowers -.
Mehdi Hasan: Danny, Gaza is an occupied territory. This nonsense that you have a border is absurd.
Danny Ayalon: Not with candy, but with bombs. Listen, well, I’m sorry, I’m sorry -.
Mehdi Hasan: Gaza is an occupied territory, the people there are living in an open-air prison camp and you’re saying it’s a border.
Danny Ayalon: No, no, I -, I beg to differ, I beg to differ. Gaza is not an occupied territory, because Gaza was handed to -.
Mehdi Hasan: You beg to differ with the United Nations, the European Union, the International Criminal Court -.
Danny Ayalon: No, no.
Mehdi Hasan: Every Western government. The International Committee for the Red Cross says Gaza is being treated with collective punishment, that’s the view of the ICRC.
Mehdi Hasan: Can I ask a question? Does Israel control Gaza’s borders, airspace and territorial waters, yes or no?
Danny Ayalon: No. No.
Mehdi Hasan: [Who does]?
Danny Ayalon: No.
Mehdi Hasan: Really?
Danny Ayalon: Isra-, no!
Mehdi Hasan: Wow.
Danny Ayalon: Because I’ll tell you -.
Mehdi Hasan: You’re just going to come here and say bare-faced falsehoods?
Danny Ayalon: No, the things are not yes and no.
Mehdi Hasan: So, fishermen who go beyond six miles and get shot, they just imagine the bullets hitting them?
Danny Ayalon: Listen, listen -, the blockade is because -, the blockade is because -,
Mehdi Hasan: Didn’t actually ask about the blockade but I’m glad you brought that up.
Danny Ayalon: No, the Hamas is killing us!
Mehdi Hasan: The World Bank says you’re strangling Palestinian territory with the blockade.
Danny Ayalon: The Hamas is killing and want to kill us, and they say, “We want to blot Israel off the map, we don’t want any Jews there,” and this is the main problem.
Mehdi Hasan: Your former boss, Avigdor Lieberman, Israel’s current defence minister, founder of your party -.
Danny Ayalon: Oh, you -, you are -, you raise now a touchy issue. I would like to (overtalking) [refer to me as my former boss].
Mehdi Hasan: OK, well he’s the defence -, he’s -, hold on, he’s -, he is your former boss, he’s also the current defence minister of Israel.
Danny Ayalon: I’m not with the party anymore, independent, please, let it be recorded.
Mehdi Hasan: OK. He said -, he said, quote, “There are no innocent people in the Gaza Strip,” to justify the killings, do you support that statement?
Danny Ayalon: Listen, I’m not in the government, I do not support Lieberman, I do not support many things he says, I -, I don’t think that there are not innocent people in Gaza, there are, but they’re subject to the terror of Hamas, and they’re sending them into the border.
Mehdi Hasan: And when General Zvika Vogel, former head of Southern Command, said in April, “If a child or anyone else gets close to the fence his punishment is death,” do you support that? Death penalty for anyone who comes near a fence?
Danny Ayalon: I -, I don’t agree to that, except if he is holding a weapon.
Mehdi Hasan: Mohammed Ibrahim Ayoub, 14 years old, was not holding any weapon. An Israeli sniper shot him in the head. Did he deserve to die?
Danny Ayalon: No one deserves to die unless they aim to kill.
Mehdi Hasan: So, why did an Israeli sniper shoot him in the head?
Danny Ayalon: Unless they aim to kill.
Mehdi Hasan: He wasn’t aiming to kill, so why was he shot in the head?
Danny Ayalon: I’m not sure, I’m not sure. If you look at the -, if you look at the -, at the facts -.
Mehdi Hasan: What are the facts?
Danny Ayalon: The facts are -.
Mehdi Hasan: I mean, you don’t do -, there’s no transparent investigations, you don’t allow any international investigators in, and then you say, trust you – that the nurse had a bomb and a 14-year-old guy was going to kill a sniper.
Danny Ayalon: I do trust the Israeli military, I do trust the Israeli Supreme Court which is very much trusted by all the world, Israel is transparent -, Israel -.
Mehdi Hasan: Pfft, that’s -.
Danny Ayalon: Well, I’m sorry -.
Mehdi Hasan: That’s not what human rights groups in Israel say.
Danny Ayalon: Listen, I may say-, I may say things which may be inconvenient truth but -.
Mehdi Hasan: They’re also not true factually but -.
Danny Ayalon: But I’m here to speak the truth.
Mehdi Hasan: Let’s go to our panel that we are talking to here in the Oxford Union. Diana Butto is an Israeli -, is a Palestinian citizen in Israel, is a human rights lawyer, is a former adviser to the PLO. Would you concede that Hamas does have some responsibility for the way in which is runs Gaza, for the way in which it incites attacks against Israel, for some of the deaths in Pa-, in-, in the Gaza Strip?
Diana Buttu: Absolutely not. Every choice Israel has made, Israel’s always had an opportunity to choose whether to kill these -, these people who are out -, who are protesting, or not to kill them, and they have deliberately chosen to kill them. The idea that, somehow, we are all linked to Hamas, that somehow we -, because people are linked to Hamas that they are not human beings, is absolutely ridiculous. He knows very well that the only time that a soldier can shoot is if that soldier himself or herself is under imminent threat; there have been no Israeli soldiers killed or injured, it means that what Israel’s doing is deliberately choosing to slaughter Palestinians.
Mehdi Hasan: Before I bring back Danny to respond to that -.
Mehdi Hasan: Before I bring back -, before I bring back Danny to respond to that -.
Danny Ayalon: No way, no way!
Mehdi Hasan: Paul Charney’s here from the Zionist Federation of the UK, former -, you served in the IDF?
Paul Charney: I did.
Mehdi Hasan: When you see what’s going on in Gaza, when you put yourself in those positions of those Israeli soldiers, do you -, do you say, “You know what, they shouldn’t have pulled a trigger on those kids, they weren’t posing an imminent threat. A 14-year-old boy’s not a threat to me,” or do you say actually as Danny does, “Everyone could be a threat?”
Paul Charney: So, as an officer in the IDF, I held myself to the highest regards and I hope that h-, they held me to the highest regard. No one in the Israeli army has got-, has ever had an order to kill l-, civilians, that’s never happened; I’ve never been around to see it, I’ve never heard it happen. On -, on the other side of it, when Hamas tell Israel that “We are here to breach that border and come and kill civilians,” we take them in Israel very seriously. It’s the one thing you can trust with Hamas, breaching a border, breaching a border of any country is an act of war. Do not ask Israel not to defend their civilians.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, let’s put that point to-, let’s put that point to Avi Shlaim.
Mehdi Hasan: Avi Shlaim, prominent British Israeli historian, former professor here at Oxford University. Avi Shlaim, any other country would do what Israel’s done, Israel has a right to defend itself, is what we hear.
Avi Shlaim: I served in the IDF in the mid-1960s and I served loyally and proudly because in my time the IDF was true to its name, it was the Israel Defence Force. But after the June 1967 war, everything changed. Israel became a colonial power and the IDF became the brutal police force of a brutal colonial power. But there is absolutely no self-defence justification for Israel’s brutal policies in Gaza over the last 11 years. A whole series of war crimes were committed and Israel continued to commit war crimes in Gaza in every successive vicious assault on the people of Gaza, not Hamas.
Mehdi Hasan: Danny, isn’t -, isn’t that the -, isn’t that the problem that Avi points out, that you keep saying, you know, “Israel has a right to defend itself, Israeli families [are allowed to] …,” but when you look at the numbers over the last 10, 15 years just alone, the ratio is phenomenal. It’s the Gazans who are being killed, not Israelis, in their thousands. Five hundred kids killed in one summer bombardment.
Danny Ayalon: The ratio speaks of the ruthless cruelty of the Hamas leaders.
Mehdi Hasan: So, you don’t take responsibility for any death of any Palestinian civilian, because ultimately it’s all Hamas’ fault, always?
Danny Ayalon: Yes, it is.
Mehdi Hasan: That’s a great get-out-of-jail-free card. OK.
Danny Ayalon: Yes, it is. Yes, it is. I’m not saying that there are no accidents, which are deplorable, but the responsibility squarely lies with Hamas.
Mehdi Hasan: Danny, I want to ask you this; Israel prides itself on being a democracy, you say, supposedly the only democracy in the Middle East, yet in recent years even Israel’s own human rights organisations are saying democracy there is under assault from a series of authoritarian, racist, far-right laws.
Danny Ayalon: Israel is a democracy, rule of law, you know, two of our leaders were thrown into jail, and you know what? It was an Arab Israeli who threw the president of Israel into jail.
Mehdi Hasan: When the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, passes the Boycott Law which makes any Israeli organisation that calls for a boycott against Israel liable to be sued for damages, the Nakba Law, which cuts state funding from any organisation which marks the country’s independence day as a day of mourning, the NGO Law, which targets quote/unquote “foreign-funded human rights organisations”, one parliamentarian in Israel called it “A semi-fascistic law that harms democracy and is reminiscent of Putin’s Russia.” That’s an Israeli politician speaking.
Danny Ayalon: Of course, because in Israel you can say anything and you can -, you know what, no one attacks the Israeli government more than Israelis and Israeli newspapers, and I’m proud of that. I am proud of that. Israel is a democracy, anybody can come and go, say and speaks what he wants
Mehdi Hasan: Reuven Rivlin, who is the president of Israel, not a liberal, conservative -.
Danny Ayalon: I respect him very much, yeah.
Mehdi Hasan: Anti-Palestinian stater, he says Israel -, “Israeli society is sick, it is our duty to treat this disease.” You don’t agree with him either?
Danny Ayalon: I don’t agree with that, but I respect what he says.
Mehdi Hasan: Why are all these people saying it? Have they all gone mad?
Danny Ayalon: Because they are -, well, they are concerned, they are entitled to their own views, and -.
Mehdi Hasan: So, you’re not concerned about these trends?
Danny Ayalon: No, and they are -, listen, they speak subjectively, it doesn’t mean that this is the objective situation. It’s not that Israel is perfect, no country is -.
Mehdi Hasan: Let me give you an example from your time in office. You were in government under Avigdor Lieberman, you were his deputy foreign minister, he was foreign minister.
Danny Ayalon: Yeah.
Mehdi Hasan: He and you wanted to subject Israel’s one and a half millions citizens of -, Palestinian citizens to an oath of loyalty to Israel as a Jewish state, a proposal so controversial one minister at the time described it as “borderline fascist”.
Danny Ayalon: Do you know that every American, I don’t know how it is here, pledge the law, the loyalty of allegiance every day in school?
Mehdi Hasan: Americans don’t pledge allegiance to Christianity, they have a separation of-, it’s not…
Danny Ayalon: We do not either, we do not either.
Mehdi Hasan: No, the proposal was you had to support Israel as a Jewish state.
Danny Ayalon: Of course, but Judaism is not only a religion.
Mehdi Hasan: Oh, is it a nationality? That’s even worse.
Danny Ayalon: It’s -, no. It’s a -, no.
Mehdi Hasan: To be asking people to pledge allegiance to a religion and a race they’re not part of, and you’re comparing that to the US oath of allegiance.
Danny Ayalon: Judais -, Judaism is a way of life, is a culture, is a whole civilisation, if you will. So, there’s nothing wrong with pledging allegiance country. The country -.
Mehdi Hasan: So, you supported that policy which was eventually watered down because it was so controversial.
Danny Ayalon: Listen, the country that clothes you and protects you, and give you jobs, and give you money, including to all the Arab Israelis.
Mehdi Hasan: OK. Diana Buttu, you, are a Palestinian citizen of Israel, do you recognise the very rosy picture being painted by Danny Ayalon?
Diana Buttu: Absolutely not. Look, one thing that he is conveniently overlooking is that Israel is -, describes itself as being a Jewish state, which by its very definition excludes me, and the -, the state is founded on this concept of Jewish privilege, which means that when the -, when the Supreme Court, this court that he lauds so much, has faced the question of whether Israel’s a Jewish state or a democracy it has always chosen Jewish state, which means that Jewish privilege exists. And we see this through everything, from the 60 laws that directly discriminate against Palestinian citizens of Israel, to the way that people such as Ayalon and others deal with Palestinians for everything from calling for our heads to be chopped off, for us to be drowned, for oaths of loyalty. What they fail to recognise is that -, that we didn’t come to Israel, we didn’t immigrate to Israel, Israel came to us.
Mehdi Hasan: Avi Shlaim, many would say you’re on the left of the political spectrum. When you look at Israeli society today, do you worry about the trends? Do you share President’s Rivlin’s view that this is a quote/unquote “sick society” that needs some kind of treatment?
Avi Shlaim: I’m very troubled about the trend in Israeli society, Israel within its original borders is a democracy. It’s a flawed democracy, but so are all other democracies. But if you look at Israel and the West Bank and Gaza it -, Israel most emphatically, most decidedly, is not a democracy. It’s an ethnocracy; it’s a system in which one ethnic group dominates the others. And there is another word for ethnocracy, and that is apartheid, and this is what Israel is.
Mehdi Hasan: Paul, I’m going to ask you two questions; one is the same question I asked Avi, are you worried about the trends in Israel, does that worry you at all? And secondly, do you want to respond to Avi’s claim about Israel being an ethnocracy and an apartheid state?
Paul Charney: Every democracy around the world has its own unique features. The Israeli democracy and the “Israeliness” was built and established because of what happened in -, partially because of what happened in the Holocaust, and therefore, a Jewish majority must remain for safety and for security because we’ve seen what happens when you rely on the rest of the world for your safety.
Number two: Anyone else who lives as an Israeli has absolute equal rights. Every Israeli Arab has the same rights of university, of hospitals, of -, of Supreme Court in law, and everything else.
Mehdi Hasan: Diana’s shaking her head. She’s saying no.
Diana Buttu: The Knesset has time and again been asked the simple question “Is Israel a state that’s founded on equality or is there no equality?” and time and again, It will not allow a simple law that calls for equality, and the fundamental problem is that they do not recognise my right to exist and my right to be there.
Danny Ayalon: Listen, have you -, have you ever been arrested by Israeli police? Have you ever been beaten by Israeli police? Have you been ever -.
Diana Buttu: Yes, actually, I have.
Danny Ayalon: Oh well -, well, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Mehdi Hasan: That was a -, that’s probably -.
Diana Buttu: [Yes I have, exactly].
Mehdi Hasan: Not the best question to ask a Palestinian.
Danny Ayalon: Yes, yes, yes.
Danny Ayalon: I -, I really feel y -, you can check the bruises, she is all bruised up, right?
Mehdi Hasan: Let’s just be clear. First, you’re saying that if you haven’t been beaten by the Israeli police you’re an equal member of society, and then, when someone says they have been beaten by Israeli police you say, “Where are the bruises?”
Danny Ayalon: No, no, listen -.
Mehdi Hasan: I’m just -, I’m asking you to clarify what was said.
Danny Ayalon: She went to school; was she denied education? Was she denied social – (overtalking).
Mehdi Hasan: So, that’s your definition?
Danny Ayalon: What is your definition?
Mehdi Hasan: Hold on, in -, in -.
Danny Ayalon: She is Israeli, just like me.
Mehdi Hasan: Hold on, black people -, black Americans during the Jim Crow era could go to school, it doesn’t mean that there wasn’t massive segregation and discrimination against black Americans.
Danny Ayalon: This is -, but there is not -, but Israel is -.
Mehdi Hasan: It’s weird, weird criteria.
Danny Ayalon: No, but Jews and Arabs can go to school together -.
Mehdi Hasan: Do you support -.
Danny Ayalon: And they do go to school together.
Mehdi Hasan: There -, there were protests on TV just a few weeks ago, Israelis were saying they didn’t want to sell a house in their town to a Palestinian family, (overtalking) apartheid.
Danny Ayalon: Fine, and how many Arabs -, and how many Arabs did not want to sell to Israeli?
Mehdi Hasan: “That’s fine,” did you just say “That’s fine”?
Danny Ayalon: Listen -.
Mehdi Hasan: Did you just say “That’s fine” to Israeli people protesting against the sale of a house in their town?
Danny Ayalon: No, it’s -.
Mehdi Hasan: Are you OK with that?
Danny Ayalon: They can protest, which is good.
Mehdi Hasan: Are you saying it’s good, your words, for people to protest against the sale of a house to a Palestinian family to keep the town Jewish-only? ‘Cause that’s what I just said happened and you said, “Fine,” and then you said, “good.” Are you OK with that?
Danny Ayalon: Listen, you have people here and there who I do not believe that they’re right, but it is the law -.
Mehdi Hasan: So, you would condemn those pro -, so would you condemn those protests? Because a moment ago you said it’s “good” that they’re protesting.
Danny Ayalon: Because it’s a democratic society, you can protest.
Mehdi Hasan: But it’s a racist protest! You don’t have to be OK with the protest.
Danny Ayalon: You can protest whatever you want! It’s called -, it’s called -.
Mehdi Hasan: But you condemn those protests?
Danny Ayalon: It’s called freedom of expression and speech.
Mehdi Hasan: And he is -, and I’m asking you to give us some free speech, do you condemn those protests?
Danny Ayalon: I condemn anything which is biased against race, religion -.
Mehdi Hasan: I’ll ask again.
Danny Ayalon: Gender -.
Mehdi Hasan: Do you condemn those protests, Danny?
Danny Ayalon: Protests as such or what they represent?
Mehdi Hasan: Whatever you like Danny, just do something! Give me an answer!
Danny Ayalon: I condemn -, you know what, I condemn any racism.
Mehdi Hasan: OK.
Danny Ayalon: OK?
Mehdi Hasan: A general statement, you won’t condemn those protests, though.
Danny Ayalon: I would condemn them.
Mehdi Hasan: Oh wow, OK, we got there.
Mehdi Hasan: Last question, another one, since you’re in a mood of condemnation. Benjamin Netanyahu, you say you don’t speak for the government -.
Danny Ayalon: Not at all.
Mehdi Hasan: In 2015, he said during the election campaign, “The right-wing government is in danger, Arab voters are coming out in droves to the polls.” Surely that was an example of unashamed naked racism towards a fifth of the population from the prime minister of the country?
Danny Ayalon: I would not use this, I would not do that, but you have to understand something else. In democracy, right, in democracy, you do everything you can do in order to win the elections.
Mehdi Hasan: That’s not what I asked.
Danny Ayalon: And -.
Mehdi Hasan: I mean, racist parties do racist things to win elections.
Danny Ayalon: No, you have to look at -, no.
Mehdi Hasan: I’m asking you do you agree it’s racist?
Danny Ayalon: It’s wrong but not racist.
Mehdi Hasan: We’re going to take a break, it’s going to continue in part two, we’re going to be talking about the Iran deal and Israel’s position on Iran and nuclear weapons. We’ll be hearing from our very patient audience here in the Oxford Union, do join us after the break.
Mehdi Hasan: Welcome back to Head to Head on Al Jazeera English, I am joined this week by Danny Ayalon, former Israeli deputy foreign minister, founder of the group “The Truth about Israel”. Danny, you have lobbied extensively against the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, the JCPOA; you think it’s a bad deal and, like Prime Minister Netanyahu, you welcomed President Trump’s decision to pull the United States out of that deal to violate it. So, to be clear, you don’t agree that the deal, with all its faults, is working and is putting off the realisation of the Iranian nuclear vision by 10 to 15 years.
Danny Ayalon: No, if you look for the last two and a half years since the deal was signed in Vienna, you see the aggression of Iran not only has, has multiplied by two, by 10 ten times, Iran since signing the deal has become much more aggressive, has not stopped testing ballistic missiles and you do ballistic missiles only to put a warhead which is nuclear, nothing else, and the deal itself is not actually neutralising the capability of Iran, it just supposedly suspends it and so -.
Mehdi Hasan: So people who say -, so people who say the Iran deal has neutralised a major threat to the world, they’re wrong.
Danny Ayalon: Absolutely, maybe -.
Mehdi Hasan: That’s the former head of Shin Bet Israeli intelligence, Carmi Gillon.
Danny Ayalon: Of course, you’re right, maybe, maybe they were just -.
Mehdi Hasan: And the quote I said earlier about “with all its faults, it’s working, it’s putting off realisation of the Iranian nuclear vision”, do you know who said that? The head of the Israel’s military, General Gadi Eisenkot, so what do you know that the head of Israel’s military and the former head of its spy service don’t know?
Danny Ayalon: And guess what? The head of Israeli military, he is still there working with everybody because we have pluralism of ideas. OK.
Mehdi Hasan: But the substance, Danny, substance of what he said.
Danny Ayalon: The substance, OK, the substance is that there is a sunset clause where they can, now in seven and half years become a nuclear country; the substance is that there is no verification which is robust and many sites are precluded because they are declared military sites.
Mehdi Hasan: The head of the IAEA the UN body classed with investigating nuclear programmes around the world. Says quote, “Iran is subject to the world’s most robust nuclear verification region under the UJCPA, which is a significant gain. As of today, the IAEA can confirm that the nuclear-related commitments are being implemented by Iran.” That was him in May. So, who should we trust the head of the IEA or you?
Danny Ayalon: Trust the facts. Trust the facts and straight logic, common logic. I believe that the IAEA are not lying, they did not find anything, but why aren’t they finding anything? Because they have 24 days in advance to let them know they are coming and there are many, many areas which are designed military areas where they have no entry to. Now, we know that Iran has lied and has cheated time and again. As a member -.
Mehdi Hasan: We don’t know that, but -.
Danny Ayalon: – wait a minute, as a signatory to NPT, Non-Proliferation Treaty, they have broken all the rules, all international commitments -.
Mehdi Hasan: What I don’t understand is, if it’s common sense, as you say, why is it that the head of Israel’s military, the former head of Shin Bet, the former head of Mossad your spy agency, the former head of Israeli military intelligence, the former head of Israel’s atomic energy commission, the chair of Israel’s space agencies. Your country’s top military defence, intelligence, nuclear experts are saying the deal’s a good deal; it protects Israel, it protects the region, it protects the world. Why should we ignore all of them and trust you, Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump?
Danny Ayalon: They do not say it’s a good deal. They say the situation is better than before, and I say it’s not better than before, it may put Iran “on hold”, but we are not certain -.
Mehdi Hasan: And yet, and yet the worlds non-proliferation experts in open letters, the top nuclear scientists in the world, the EU, the UN, the IAEA, they all say it’s working.
Danny Ayalon: I know international diplomacy, there is nothing which is more hypocritical and cynic. There are some interest to our in, in-between. I can tell you that until ’38 most people here said Germany, Nazi Germany is not a threat, were they all wrong? Yes, they were all wrong. Are they all wrong now? Yes, they are.
Mehdi Hasan: It’s funny, you talk about predictions; in 1992, your prime minister said Iran was three years away from building the nukes, that was 26 years ago. In 1995, he said Iran was three-to-five years away from building nukes. In 2009, he said they were one-to-two years away from building nukes. The boy who cried wolf had a better record with wolves than Netanyahu has with Iran’s nuclear programme. Why do you think you have any credibility of the Israeli’s when you come and talk about Iran’s nuclear program? You’ve been wrong for 26 years.
Danny Ayalon: We are not wrong, some things had happened in between, there were some who prevented Iran to rush for it and there were some, there were some -.
Mehdi Hasan: Come on Danny, every two-to-three years, Netanyahu issued a warning and suddenly something happened to make his warning just inaccurate, how convenient. You’ve been scaremongering for years.
Danny Ayalon: Well I can tell you, I can tell you that you know the Iranian’s themselves say that the international community is sabotaging their programme. So, things have happened.
Mehdi Hasan: OK.
Danny Ayalon: That’s it.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, let me ask you this question, sabotaging their programme, how many nuclear weapons does Iran have, as of today?
Danny Ayalon: Right now, I hope none.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, how many does Israel have?
Danny Ayalon: No idea.
Mehdi Hasan: No idea, you were in the government, they don’t tell you that stuff; who do they tell?
Danny Ayalon: No idea, I’m telling you, I never discussed it, but it’s irrelevant.
Mehdi Hasan: It’s between, you never discussed Israel’s nuclear weapons? You can say that hand on heart you’ve never discussed Israel’s nuclear weapons, you’re expecting us to believe that the deputy foreign minister visited, you never discussed Israel’s nuclear deterrent? Seriously?
Danny Ayalon: No, so let, let me tell you. It’s not all slogans and sound bites -.
Mehdi Hasan: Tell yourself that, my friend.
Danny Ayalon: – I did not discuss Israel nuclear weapons. I did discuss Israel nuclear policy, there is a big difference.
Mehdi Hasan: OK.
Danny Ayalon: OK.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, so now we’ve got past that semantic evasion.
Danny Ayalon: No, no you have to, you -.
Mehdi Hasan: How many nuclear weapons does Israel have? Because experts says it’s anywhere between 80 and 400.
Danny Ayalon: So what? So what?
Mehdi Hasan: “So what”?
Danny Ayalon: Yeah, so what? As Israel ever threatened -.
Mehdi Hasan: Do you recognise the hypocrisy of Israel having a secret illicit nuclear weapons programme that it won’t open up its doors to and won’t talk about and then lecturing everyone else in the region about nuclear weapons?
Danny Ayalon: Absolutely not, do you know why?
Danny Ayalon: So, let’s start with the legal and formal.
Mehdi Hasan: Yeah.
Danny Ayalon: Israel has never been a member, a signatory of the NPT, so we are not breaking any rules. Iran was, Iraq was, Syria is and they all tried to, to cheat, number one. Secondly -.
Mehdi Hasan: But you never recognise the laws in the first place.
Danny Ayalon: No, secondly -.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, quick get-out.
Danny Ayalon: – Israel is the only country in the world who has been, right, threatened to just erase them, there is only one Jewish state in the world, less than one-third of one percent of the entire Middle East. There are 22 Arab countries, 57, what do you want from us? And they are all trying to, to gang up on us.
Mehdi Hasan: It’s not like you’re just minding your own business, this kind of Norway in the Middle East with nuclear weapons.
Danny Ayalon: Has Israel ever threatened to erase and attack any country? No.
Mehdi Hasan: Err, I think you’ll find plenty of pretty genocidal statements from Israeli leaders.
Danny Ayalon: Show, show it to me.
Mehdi Hasan: Shimon Peres said in response to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that we could wipe Iran off the map.
Danny Ayalon: Iran, Iran has every day threatening to erase Israel from the map.
Mehdi Hasan: I’m not talking about Iran, I’m asking about Israel.
Danny Ayalon: Saddam Hussain said he would burn the entire country of Israel, Assad, Hamas, you know what even members of Israeli Knesset Arab countries.
Mehdi Hasan: Danny, I’ll ask again, we’ve gone off on a lovely diversion which you’re the master off, how many nuclear weapons does Israel have?
Danny Ayalon: I don’t know, by the way another diversion which I have to say, I have to say -.
Mehdi Hasan: No, no, you can’t preannounce your diversions. Let me ask again, if an Iranian guest came on my show and I asked them about Iran’s nuclear weapons, “I don’t know I’m not gonna talk about it,” would you be OK with that? You’d be outraged.
Danny Ayalon: Of course, I would be.
Mehdi Hasan: And yet you sit here as a former minister of the Israeli government saying, “Oh I don’t know about nuclear, anyone.”
Danny Ayalon: Because, because there was like 16 United Nation Security Council resolutions against Iran and -.
Mehdi Hasan: And there is against Israel, and there is against Israel, as well.
Danny Ayalon: About the nuclear programme, no.
Mehdi Hasan: Yes, there is, UN resolution 487, let me read it to you, the UN Security Council in 1981 says calls upon Israel urgently to place its nuclear facilities under the safeguards of the IAEA, why haven’t you done that?
Danny Ayalon: I tell you why, because we want to live and survive, this is the only reason, live and survive.
Mehdi Hasan: But you are defying a UN Security Council resolution on your secret nuclear weapons programme.
Danny Ayalon: Live and survive, that’s it.
Mehdi Hasan: Avi Shlaim, when Danny talks about the threat from Iran, do you recognise that language? How big a threat in your view is Iran to Israel today?
Avi Shlaim: Iran is not an existential threat to Israel but it is a strategic threat. Now, let’s compare the records of these two countries, Iran has never attacked a neighbour, Israel has repeatedly attacked its neighbours, Iran signed the non-proliferation treaty, Israel has refused to sign. Iran submits to inspection by the international nuclear energy agency, Israel refuses to submit. Iran has no nuclear weapons, Israel has between 75 and 400 nuclear weapons, so Israel poses an existential threat to Iran.
Avi Shlaim: One more point to make, for the last 40 years Israel has conducted a systematic campaign of disinformation about Iran. Why the lies?, Why the double standards? Why the hypocrisy?
Danny Ayalon: Professor Shlaim, can you say this in a straight face? I cannot believe it, if you look into details Israel, right, has been in existential threat ever since, ever since it’s re-establishment and it was re-established in 1948. As a historian, as an historian, and I’m sure you will agree, Israel only out of self-defence, is defending itself and Israel has never, ever threatened another country.
Avi Shlaim: Israel has attacked its neighbours, not in self-defence, one example, the first one is the Suez War of 1956, it wasn’t a war of self-defence, it was a colonial conspiracy to attack Egypt. Lebanon 1982 was most emphatically not a war of self-defence, it was an invasion, Israeli invasion of Lebanon.
Mehdi Hasan: Paul, let me ask you this question, you’re not a member of the Israeli government, you’ve never been a member of the Israeli government, can I ask you for a straight answer, how many nuclear weapons does Israel have?
Paul Charney: I don’t know, you’re asking me -.
Mehdi Hasan: How many do you think from what you -?
Paul Charney: You know what, I, I tell you what, I’m listening to the conversation with all due respect, we cannot rely, Israel cannot rely on Europe and the Western world to defend its own policies. Israel had huge disagreements in its own government whether to take out the Iraqi nuclear core 1982 and it took it out and it was condemned at the time and Israel have the same dispute late ’90s, ’98 when they took out the Syrian nuclear core and it was condemned by Europe and guess what? Later, the condemnation fizzled away. We are in the same positions we were then as we are with Iran.
Mehdi Hasan: Do you think Israel should have nuclear weapons? Do you support Israeli government?
Paul Charney: Every weapon, possibly a defensive weapon like the iron dome, Israel should have a hundred iron domes which it has -.
Mehdi Hasan: I didn’t ask about the iron domes.
Paul Charney: Israel should have every defensive weapon.
Mehdi Hasan: Do you think Israel should have nuclear weapons?
Paul Charney: Absolute, as a defence, as a defensive weapon, Israel should absolutely have nuclear weapons, Iran as offensive weapon should not have nuclear weapons.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, let’s go, Diana has been waiting very patiently, there’s a difference between offensive Iran and defensive Israel when it comes to nuclear weapons in the Middle East.
Diana Buttu: What I think we’re getting to is that, Israel is saying that it is above the law and it does this time and again, it says that it has the right to attack countries which it did when it came to Iraq, when it’s come to Syria, when it’s come to Lebanon, when it’s come to the Palestinians and it’s also saying that it has no reason, it has no right to be subjected to the law.
Mehdi Hasan: Diana says you’re above the law and you yourself said we didn’t sign the NPT. Let me ask you this question; if Iran tomorrow withdraws from the NPT would you stop talking about Iran? Because they’re in your boat, they can do what you do, right?
Danny Ayalon: No.
Mehdi Hasan: Isn’t that the logic of your position?
Danny Ayalon: No, because they want nuclear capabilities for offensive measures, if Israel, and again I’m not at liberty to say anything, but, about this subject, but if Israel has it or not, it, is a defensive one.
Mehdi Hasan: Completely subjective what defensive -.
Danny Ayalon: And the Palestinians -.
Mehdi Hasan: Because you say it’s defensive, they would say it’s defensive, everyone will get nuclear weapons in way of defence.
Danny Ayalon: By the way, by the way, I hope, I hope Miss Buttu is not suicidal, because if Iran with a nuclear weapon throwing it on Israel, you and I will die at the same time, you know that.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, OK, well, let’s go to the audience who have been waiting very patiently here, in the Oxford Union, Let’s start with the gentleman here in the front row.
Audience participant 1: I would like to ask you, Mr Ayalon, about Israel’s denying access to healthcare for people in Gaza. Last year, according to the World Health Organisation, 54 people died in Gaza because they had not got the treatment they needed to in the West Bank and sometimes beyond. Forty-six of those had cancer, many of them were women. Eleven thousand medical appointments were missed last year after Israel refused to allow people to get to that treatment, is that not unconscionable?
Danny Ayalon: If that had been true, absolutely unconscionable, but it’s completely not true. Israel is, is, actually piping into the, to the Gaza, everything which could help the Shifa and all the other hospitals and clinics, by the way, which the Hamas is using them as a base to launch, you know that since we left, since we left Gaza, 11 thousand, 800 bombs were launched on Israel.
Mehdi Hasan: He asked the question about 44 cancer patients, World Health Organisation figures, that’s all made up according to you?
Danny Ayalon: You know what, I don’t even know, because I, you know I, but I can tell you there is a policy, right, there is a policy to help anyone in need and we have proven it, why don’t you go to Hamas and ask them? Why don’t they stop their terror and then Gaza will be open to the world. When we left in 2005, we invested there, you know millions of dollars, they burnt everything, Why? Why?
Mehdi Hasan: OK, let’s go to this gentleman here in the blue shirt:
Audience participant 2: Thank you, the Great March of Return protests were ostensibly organised in support of the notion of a right of return. My question is, to what extent does the propagation of a notion of Palestinian right of return by the international community served to perpetuate and prolong rather than create a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
Danny Ayalon: “Right of Return”, Mehdi Hasan, is a euphemism, there is no right and no return, because you’re talking now about fifth and fourth generation of displaced people and, according to international law, they should have been naturalised by the countries who receive them. There were 20 million refugees in Europe, Czechs, German, Polish, you don’t hear about this problem. There were 890,000 Jewish refugees from Arab countries, you don’t hear about them. The problem is again, and I do not blame the Palestinian people, I feel for them. It’s successive Palestinian leadership who betrayed you.
Mehdi Hasan: Since you mentioned, since you mentioned Miss Buttu Diana, no right, no return under international law, is that correct from your point of view?
Diana Buttu: There is a right of return, by using his same logic again, then we wouldn’t be talking about as he put it, the re-establishment of a Jewish state. If we’re talking about the re-establishment of a Jewish state, then it would have been that Jews also didn’t have that right as well. So you can’t have it, that one group of people has a right and Palestinians have no right, we absolutely have a right of return and that is enshrined in international law.
Danny Ayalon: This is our land and we re-establish our sovereignty after 2,000 years -.
Mehdi Hasan: This is your land based on 2,000 years, she’s saying why can’t four or five generations, if you can go back 20 generations?
Mehdi Hasan: Let’s go to this lady here in the front row.
Audience participant 3: I’m a Palestinian journalist from Gaza and Israel has time and again said and the Israeli army actually claimed to be measured and surgical in the way that they engage with the Palestinian protesters and whoever is present near the Gaza fence. And then, now I hear, and it’s very concerning to me that the killing of my friend actually and colleague Yasser Murtaja in Gaza was because he was there with an intent to harm. The Israeli army has always cleared itself of any wrong-doing; isn’t it time for an independent investigation? What is Israel afraid of? How is it surgical to kill journalists in press vests and paramedics in white coats and children and peaceful protesters and then not have independent investigators or allow them to investigate?
Danny Ayalon: Well, Israel has nothing to be afraid of. Israel has nothing to hide and, by the way, I really appreciate the fact that you came from Gaza out here, which is fine, which is very nice.
Danny Ayalon: I would wish more Gazans would be able to come out -.
Mehdi Hasan: So, why not lift your blockade? You could lift the blockade tomorrow, come on, Danny, you’re patronising people here, come on.
Danny Ayalon: No, you, you need, you need a different leadership in Gaza, that’s what you need with a different leadership in Gaza, more of you could come out.
Mehdi Hasan: Is it time for an independent investigation, if you’ve got nothing to hide?
Danny Ayalon: No, because no country, no democratic country is willing to infringe upon its sovereignty. Show me when England, United States, France or any other country, democratic country allowed an independent investigation.
Mehdi Hasan: None of those countries are apparently illegally occupying people’s land, by the way, just for the factual record. Let’s go back to the back, back there on the window, yes, you waving, can we get a mic there?
Audience participant 4: Yeah, hi, how do you justify or do you support Palestinians being forcibly removed from their homes and thrown out to make way for Israeli settlers?
Danny Ayalon: Fair question, I do not approve Palestinians being forced out of their homes, as I do not approve Jews being forced out of their homes and the Israeli government did both, I can tell you that. But again, there is a rule of law and sometimes if you build things illegally, the government comes and tells you well, it’s illegal, they do it to Jews and they do it to Arabs. Full stop.
Mehdi Hasan: They don’t demolish dozens of houses in one go as collective punishment for any Jewish Israeli’s and you know that. You’re just saying stuff that’s false.
Danny Ayalon: They would do it had they built it illegally and they have done it.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, but they also destroy houses, the families of quote/unquote terrorists are destroyed by Israel. And yet when an Israeli terrorist kills a Palestinian, his family’s home is never destroyed. Funny that.
Danny Ayalon: It’s a matter of deterrence, Jews do not go -.
Mehdi Hasan: Jews don’t need deterrence, only Arabs use deterrence.
Danny Ayalon: Like those terrorists, you know you have one -.
Mehdi Hasan: Wow, did you say there’s no Israeli terrorists, there’s no Jewish terrorists?
Danny Ayalon: There are, but not as a culture.
Mehdi Hasan: Oh, Palestinians is a culture?
Danny Ayalon: Absolutely, absolutely.
Mehdi Hasan: I’m just gonna, I’m just gonna, Diana Buttu I’m gonna ask you to respond to that because you’re from a culture of terror, apparently.
Diana Buttu: This is the problem you are dealing with people who represent, a foreign representative of a government that uses racist language and that has adopted racist language and will continue to use racist language, I can’t believe that we are in anyway -.
Mehdi Hasan: Danny Ayalon, do you want to respond? Do you want to respond and clarify what you meant by culture of terror?
Danny Ayalon: Of course, I want to respond, because if you send your kids to schools where they, where they are taught to kill Jews, when you have summer schools with Palestinian kids go with straps, you know like a make-believe suicide bombs, this is a culture of terror and had you been looking into this, yes -.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, alright and when you, and when you, hold on, listen, I just got to make the point because you love, you love always saying what about this, what about that, let me do it for once. What about Israeli sitting with popcorn on top of their houses watching Gaza being bombarded, is that not a culture of hate, of death?
Danny Ayalon: No.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, lady, lady here who is waiting.
Audience participant 5: Currently, according to Israeli human rights group B’Tselem, approximately 315 Palestinian children are being held in Israeli prisons. While being arrested and held in detention, these children have no access to lawyers, cannot have a family member present while being questioned and often are coerced into signing documents in Hebrew, a language that they do not understand. How do you justify continuing imprisonment of children?
Danny Ayalon: First of all, I do not agree, people who are over 16 are not children and when they come with daggers and bombs, they are not innocent.
Mehdi Hasan: There are children under 16 being detained by Israel and you know that, Danny.
Danny Ayalon: You know what, when the IRA was attacking you, when the IRA was attacking you in London they were under 14 aged in British prisons.
Mehdi Hasan: And you expect me to sit here and defend the British government’s treatment of the Irish community? Maybe if they’d read anything I’ve written.
Danny Ayalon: No, I’m just saying, a killer is a killer is a killer.
Mehdi Hasan: Two wrongs don’t make a right, but OK, let’s go -.
Danny Ayalon: A killer is a killer.
Mehdi Hasan: “A killer is a killer”; she literally told you about children in jail and your response is “a killer is a killer,” none of those children are killers, but OK -. Let’s go back to the audience, the lady here in the black shirt, yes, wait for the microphone to come to you.
Audience participant 6: I’m very confused about something and I’d like some clarity, if Israel is an apartheid state, how come there are Christians, which I really appreciate – being a Christian, serving in the IDF and Bedouin and also Druze, I’m not talking about Jews I’m talking about the Druze, how does that work?
Mehdi Hasan: The two people who made the claim about apartheid are Diana and Avi Shlaim. Would one of you like to respond to the lady’s question about how can it be apartheid if there are Christians and Arabs and Bedouins serving in the IDF, in the Israeli military?
Diana Buttu: The question is whether the system is apartheid and it is an apartheid state and the fact that we are sitting here and while we’re sitting here, Danny has greater privileges in that country than I do, makes it an apartheid state.
Mehdi Hasan: We’re gonna go back to the audience, gentleman there with the jacket, yes?
Audience participant 7: The question is very simple, do you think the days where everything Israel does and everything it says by both the Muslim community and many other people are coming to an end where, in fact, there’s gonna be greater support for Israel as we’re seeing even now in the United Nations? Thank you.
Danny Ayalon: Thank you, well I, I would say that, certainly, we see shifting grounds, I would say most of the Arab countries today, certainly all them great Muslim countries, see Israel as the solution to the problems and not the problem. They see the Palestinians as the problem.
Mehdi Hasan: Gentleman in the beard who has been waiting for ages, last word -.
Audience participant 8: Thank you, Mehdi Hasan, my question to Danny, isn’t it true that the two-state solution is dead because of Israeli illegal settlements in West Bank and its apartheid walls because Israel always blames the other side and doesn’t take any responsibility, so should we just forget about the two-state solution and think about an alternative or one-state solution? Thank you.
Danny Ayalon: I, for one, do not think so, I do not think so, I think -.
Mehdi Hasan: You think there can still be a two-state solution?
Danny Ayalon: I think, I hope so, I think what killed the two-state solution is, again, the Arab refusals for any compromise, for them it’s all or nothing and secondly, when the road map to peace came, I was one who was privileged to, to be a part of writing it, it talked about two states for two peoples, I do not see the Palestinians who talk about two peoples, they’re talking about two states, what does it mean, two Arab states? The problem is again, I’m telling you -.
Mehdi Hasan: Hold on, you want two states for two peoples? Who are the two peoples?
Danny Ayalon: Jewish people and Palestinian people.
Mehdi Hasan: There shouldn’t be any Palestinian’s in Israel, is what you’re saying.
Danny Ayalon: Of course not, no, of course, they are -.
Mehdi Hasan: You literally just said two states for two people, I asked you to clarify.
Danny Ayalon: Of course, but the Jewish, Israel -.
Mehdi Hasan: Who is Israel for Danny?
Danny Ayalon: Israel is for citizens, mostly are Jews, because it’s a Jewish state…
Mehdi Hasan: You’re the one who said you wanted two states for two people, I was just clarifying, let me ask you -.
Danny Ayalon: Of course, Palestinians and Israeli’s, Palestinians and -.
Mehdi Hasan: Oh, before you said Jews, now you switched to Israeli, good, good move.
Danny Ayalon: No, no, no, Jews and doesn’t mean that non-Jews cannot live there.
Mehdi Hasan: Can I ask a final question? I just want to ask a question about you. Ehud Barak famously was asked, what would he have done if you’d been born a Palestinian? And he said to the reporter, “I probably would have joined a Palestinian military group to fight against Israel for my freedom.” Right, that’s what Barak said, a moment of honesty from Israel’s most-decorated soldier. I just wonder sometimes, do enough Israelis put themselves in the shoes of Palestinians living in Gaza and try and understand why it is that they’re protesting or they’re frustrated or they’re violent or is it all just, do you really just say, “Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas,” and not think about what they’re going through?
Danny Ayalon: The short answer is, yes, I can definitely do that and you know what I would do? I would do my best to get rid of Hamas leaders and terrorists.
Mehdi Hasan: OK, on that Hamas note, Danny, we’re going to have to leave it there, wrap the show up. Thanks to our audience here in the Oxford Union, thanks to our panel here in the Oxford Union, and thanks to Danny Ayalon for joining us. Head to Head will be back next week.

https://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/headtohead/2019/01/transcript-danny-ayalon-blame-gaza-190109045541716.html

Danny Ayalon on who is to blame for Gaza

Benjamin Corey: The Call For Christians To Radically Love Our Muslim Neighbors

Benjamin Corey is an author, speaker, scholar, and global traveler, who holds graduate degrees in Theology & Intercultural Studies from Gordon-Conwell, and earned his doctorate in intercultural Studies from Fuller.

Ever since the terrorist attacks of 9-11, there has been a growing hostility in America toward our Muslim neighbors. With the daily barrage of crimes against humanity being perpetuated and broadcast over social media by ISIS, that hostility toward Muslims in America– and around the world– is only growing.
While cries by my Christian brethren of persecution is usually just a loss of privilege, Muslims in America face a concerning level of distrust, bigotry, and real persecution– not the imaginary type.
Just recently, we’ve seen an increase in violent threats made against our Muslim neighbors because of the way they are depicted in the film, American Sniper, which has only served to exacerbate the anti-Muslim persecution in America. Sadly, these “threats” aren’t just threats- our Muslim neighbors are facing real acts of violence. Recently three Muslims in Chapel Hill were executed in cold blood, an act of violence that the media has downplayed as a “parking space” dispute. Last Friday we also saw the Islamic Community and Education Center in Houston burned down in an act of arson while a retired firefighter from the area tweeted “let it burn… block the fire hydrant.” And of course, there’s the man who tried to burn down a mosque after getting drunk and “riled up by Fox News” from their daily anti-Muslim propaganda.
Even in the course of the last few weeks I’ve witnessed in my own social media feeds comments made toward Muslims that would be considered hate speech and threats if such comments were directed at us. Constant fear-baiting by Christian pastors, calling Islam “evil”, saying “Muslims are the enemy of God” and all sorts of other anti-Muslim comments.
Strangely enough, it’s not simply enough to vilify our Muslim neighbors and create animosity and mistrust between us, those same voices often paint our president as being a closet Muslim or as one whose sympathies are with Islam instead of Christianity, furthering the us vs. them, “Muslims are our enemy” type mindset.
If this trend does not change, the outcome is potentially bleak. If we’re told over and over again that we are enemies there becomes a distrust and hostility that results in self-fulfilling prophesies– and enemies are born. Continue down that line far enough and our children won’t even know why they are enemies to begin with– they’ll just know to hate and mistrust Muslims, and they will learn the same of us.
Sadly, I’m not seeing religious leaders on the Christian side put forth a Christian narrative for how we are to walk this road in our current culture. In fact, what I too often see Christian leaders doing is pushing a narrative that only serves to inflame and divide us, such as Franklin Graham who teaches that Islam is a “religion of war” and “evil.”
What our culture needs more than ever is people who are modeling their lives after Jesus of Nazareth (peace be upon him) instead of operating under the current narrative of hostility that too many Christian leaders are inviting us into. If the world is going to change, it will only be because you and I chose to act – now.
How do we move forward? Ironically, let’s play their game for a minute and see where it takes us: let’s suppose that Muslims are our enemy and that Islam is evil. How do the people of Jesus respond?
Well, Jesus makes it clear: love and serve your enemies- go the extra mile for them. As far as dealing with evil, the Apostle Paul teaches in Romans that we are not to “overcome evil with evil but evil with good.”
So, fellow Christians in America and around the world, I think we have our roadmap for how we ought to live: we ought to radically love our Muslim neighbors and actively do good towards them. In fact, for those who wish to actually follow Jesus, this is the only roadmap.
Unfortunately, it’s not enough to quietly love in our hearts- we are invited to love not with words, but with actions (1 John 3:18). So here’s my challenge fellow Christians:
Changing the world starts with you. This piece is an invitation to begin participating in the “healing of the nations” by taking action, right now. That action? You are hereby challenged to find ways to radically love your Muslim neighbors– indiscriminate, lavish, love. For me, I have an easier head start because I live in a town that has a large Muslim population and most of the kids at my daughter’s school our Muslims, so I have plenty of opportunities. But I’m convinced you’ll find Muslim neighbors to love if you open your eyes and look.
Here are some ideas to get you started:
Learn how to greet Muslims in Arabic, and when you pass them on the street smile and say hello with the proper greeting (which actually means “peace be upon you”). There’s plenty of Youtube videos to teach you how, but here’s an easy one.
Find Muslim families in your neighborhood and introduce yourself. Ask if you can do something nice for them, just as neighbors and no strings attached. Help them with a project on their home, help them with yard work, or invite them to dinner (but make sure it’s halal).
Find a Muslim and sit and learn from them. Discover what they truly believe– you might be surprised at all the areas of commonality between Christianity and Islam- two members of the Abrahamic faith.
Is their a Muslim community center in your area? Go by for a visit and ask if there are any areas where you could volunteer and serve the Muslim community.
Financially support a charity geared towards serving the Muslim community. Don’t know of one? I can help: I know a great organization in my own community called The Root Cellar, and they are a community center in an impoverished area serving Muslim refugees. They provide a safe place for kids to go after school, and all sorts of other great stuff. No donation would be too small, and you can make it online, right here.
These are just a few ideas, but be creative- there’s no shortage of ways that you could find to love the Muslim neighbors in your midst.
But let me be clear: the path we are on is not a good one. Terrorism by some extreme Muslims (who are usually political and not actually that religious) is wrongfully causing all Muslims to be feared and mistrusted. This fear and mistrust gives way to real persecution, which will undoubtedly lead to legitimate fear and mistrust in return. The only way out of this cultural mess, is for someone to take responsibility for changing it– and that’s where you and I come in.
We can change the course of history in America by radically loving and serving our Muslim neighbors, and by tearing down the walls of mistrust which separate us.
Will you continue down the same old path? Or, will you choose to radically love?
I’m choosing love, and I hope you’ll join me. If you do, send me stories of your acts of kindness towards Muslims, and I’ll compile them for a future post.

The Call For Christians To Radically Love Our Muslim Neighbors

Benjamin Corey: The Call For Christians To Radically Love Our Muslim Neighbors

If The Bible Commands Us To Bless Israel, It Commands Us To Bless Muslims Too

BENJAMIN L. COREY is an author, speaker, scholar, and global traveler, who holds graduate degrees in Theology & Intercultural Studies from Gordon-Conwell, and earned his doctorate in Intercultural Studies from Fuller.He is the author of Unafraid: Moving Beyond Fear-Based Faith, and Undiluted: Rediscovering the Radical Message of Jesus.

With violence erupting between the nation of Israel and the Christians and Muslims referred to collectively as the Palestinians, so also have American Christians taken to the airwaves to pledge their unwavering support for Israel. Certainly, for those of us who grew up in fundamentalism, blind and unwavering support for the modern state of Israel was a core component of our belief system. However, this view has spread beyond fundamentalism and gone so much further that even today, our national foreign policy is actually built upon this fundamentalist assumption that we must stand with or bless Israel.
But, does the Bible actually command us to stand with Israel?
The premise for the argument that we must bless Israel stems from a reading of Genesis chapter 12. In this chapter, God speaks to Abraham and says the following:
“2 I will make you a great nation;
I will bless you
And make your name great;
And you shall be a blessing.
3 I will bless those who bless you,
And I will curse him who curses you;
And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”
As we see, God promised (made a covenant) to bless Abraham so that the whole world would be blessed through him, and that whoever blessed him would be blessed and whoever cursed him would be cursed. As Christians on the other side of the climax of human history, we now see that this covenant was fulfilled when Jesus came from the line of Abraham, and indeed the whole world was blessed. In fact, Jesus himself claimed to establish a new covenant, pointing to the fulfillment of the former covenant.
However, from this passage modern fundamentalists and even mainstream evangelicals arrive at the notion that we must bless the modern nation state of Israel, else be cursed as a people. The way they arrive at that belief is by the following deduction: The command to bless Israel extends to the descendants of Abraham, the Jews are his descendants, the Jews live in Israel, therefore we must bless Israel. Or, for my visual folks, it flows like this
The first problem we arrive at is the command to bless was aimed at Abraham, an actual person. “Israel” did not exist at the time (it’s a name God gave to Abraham’s grandson, Jacob), so the idea that all humanity must bless and support a particular nation state must be imported into the text— it’s not there on its own. However, let’s assume that it is, and that we must in fact bless and support the descendants or “children of Abraham.” Jacob, who was called Israel, was the grandson of Abraham and the son of Isaac. It is from this line that God fulfilled the covenant that “all the world will be blessed” because it is of this line that we get Jesus (and is the line of the Jewish people). However, this isn’t the only line of descendants who come from Abraham. Since Abraham had two sons, if we are actually to bless the children (plural) of Abraham we must bless the people who came from both sons, no? I would hope so, because as we see in Genesis 17, God himself blessed both of them. In Genesis 17 God gives a blessing over all of the descendants of Abraham, and says that he will be their God forever (v.7). God affirms his blessing for Abraham and both sons, noting that Isaac will be the line of the covenant (Jesus would come from this line of descendants) and that Ishmael (often forgotten in this story) would be blessed by God and become the father of a great nation– which he did. Again, for my visual folks, here’s how that looks:

<https: i2.wp.com="" wp.production.patheos.com="" blogs="" formerlyfundie="" files="" 2015="" 10="" screenshot-2015-10-15-18.50.07.png?resize="674%2C649" did="" you="" catch="" that="" last="" part?="" yeah,="" ishmael="" received="" god’s="" blessing="" as="" a="" child="" of="" abraham,="" and="" god="" promised="" to="" turn="" him="" into="" great="" nation.="" from="" we="" get="" the="" arab="" people,="" ultimately="" muslims="" well.="" all="" them="" are="" descendants="" both="" were="" his="" children.="" just="" make="" it="" clear,="" i’ll="" draw="" picture:="" https:="" i0.wp.com="" screenshot-2015-10-15-21.00.54.png?resize="375%2C414" so,="" anyone="" who="" reads="" promise="" abraham="" say,="" “yes!="" must="" stand="" with="" israel!”="" would="" be="" wise="" realize="" by="" same="" argument,="" need="" children="" abraham–="" including="" muslims.="" furthermore,="" what="" also="" goes="" overlooked="" in="" blindly="" standing="" israel="" is="" many="" palestinians="" christians="" persecuted="" israelis.="" their="" churches="" burned="" down="" defaced="" (something="" called="" price="" tag="" attacks),="" spat="" upon="" while="" walking="" street,="" christian="" schools="" have="" come="" under="" attack="" israeli="" occupation.="" for="" people="" group="" love="" talk="" about="" how="" around="" globe,="" blind="" eye="" fact="" means="" persecution="" oppression="" christians.="" ultimately,="" nation="" exists="" today="" secular="" state,="" not="" biblical="" israel,="" nowhere="" bible="" commanded="" support="" it.="" however,="" if="" one="" wants="" insist="" said="" genesis="" 12="" modern="" they’d="" apply="" passage="" faithfully="" give="" rest="" abraham’s="" unwavering="" support.="" he="" author="" unafraid:="" moving="" beyond="" fear-based="" faith,="" undiluted:="" rediscovering="" radical="" message="" jesus.="" http://www.benjaminlcorey.com="&quot; if-the-bible-commands-us-to-bless-israel-it-commands-us-to-bless-muslims-too=""

If The Bible Commands Us To Bless Israel, It Commands Us To Bless Muslims Too

BENJAMIN L. COREY : 5 Reasons Why I am A Christian Who Stopped Supporting Israel

BENJAMIN L. COREY is an author, speaker, scholar, and global traveler, who holds graduate degrees in Theology & Intercultural Studies from Gordon-Conwell, and earned his doctorate in Intercultural Studies from Fuller. He is the author of Unafraid: Moving Beyond Fear-Based Faith, and Undiluted: Rediscovering the Radical Message of Jesus.

Growing up conservative Evangelical, we loved Israel as much as we loved America– probably even more. And why not, right?
We truly believed that among the world’s nations, God actually has a favorite– and that he will curse anyone who doesn’t blindly support his team.
When you sincerely believe that, there’s little room left for actually thinking, because anything you see is filtered and given meaning by the narrative we were given at church. This false narrative we’re told about Israel makes it almost impossible to see the situation fairly or clearly, because we become victims of confirmation bias– we’re only willing to consider evidence that verifies the narrative we were taught.
As an adult at seminary studying theology and international culture, I finally broke free from the confirmation bias that had caused me to support Israel and ignore Palestinian suffering. As such, I now see the Israel and Palestinian conflict in a completely different light– one where my Christian faith itself dictates that I cannot stand with Israel and still be faithful to Jesus.
Here are 5 reasons why I stopped supporting Israel:
5. I realized that loving Jewish people was completely different from supporting the modern, secular state of Israel.
Many quickly confuse loving Jewish people with supporting Israel– but a religion/people group and a secular nation state are not the same thing. For example, one can be opposed to US policy without being “anti-American.” In the same way, one can look at Israel and say, “Wow, this is absolutely wrong” without being anti-semitic (though that’s the first thing you’ll be accused of).
I love the Jewish people because as a Jesus follower, I love all people. But I do not– I cannot– support Israel as a nation, precisely because I love all people.
4. I realized Israel was a violent military occupation, much like the one Jesus lived under.
I used to think the Israel was a peaceful nation who just wanted to mind their own business but couldn’t because those darned Muslims wouldn’t leave them alone, but that’s not the case at all. Israel is a violent military occupation, with no end in sight.
Where Palestinians once lived in peace and security, they now live under military rule by a foreign military that controls nearly all aspects of their daily lives. Their access to water is tightly restricted, their movement is restricted, and they are denied security in their homes by military forces who often stage middle-of-the-night raids under the accusation of “rock throwing.”
Furthermore, children are often Israeli targets and are imprisoned and tortured by Israeli solders. There have even been cases of Israeli soldiers shooting Palestinian children for sport. How a Christian can support this is literally unfathomable to me.
3. I realized Palestinians weren’t terrorists, but a frustrated people living under apartheid.
Imagine it this way: what if you woke up one morning and world leaders had given the Southern United States to Russia, to be a country for displaced Russians? The Russians arrive, kick you off the land that’s been in your family for generations, confiscate your homes and possessions, burn your farms, and put everyone into refugee camps or segregated into ghettos, which are then policed by the Russian military.
Would it not be understandable that once in a while you’d attack the Russian soldiers? In fact, if that were in America, most conservatives would call it self defense.
While I am against all violence, it’s important to understand why violence happens, and in this case it is quite understandable that such an oppressed people would resort to violence against the oppressors. However, this violence is not about Muslims hating Jews– it’s about people being tired of an occupying army taking their homes, their land, and harming their children. Truth be told, as wrong as I believe it is, I’d be tempted to throw a few rocks too.
2. I realized Israel continues to steal land and violate international law.
I once thought that Israel just wanted to peacefully exist, but the truth is they are on a violent conquest to take all the land they can get– even though it is a total violation of international law.
Day by day new Israeli settlements crop up on land that still belongs to Palestinians. Quite often the Israelis will burn down Palestinian crops before harvest (this is in the news often), and try to take Palestinian land by terroristic force. Illegal settlers have firebombed Palestinian homes, most recently burning a baby and mother to death. Settlers recently even attacked a Rabbi who had previous work with Christian Peacemakers, showing they’re willing to not just attack Palestinians, but even their own peacemakers.
This reminds me of someone who once said, “Oh Jerusalem! You who kill the prophets and stone those God sends to you.” (That was Jesus, BTW.)
Until Israel stops violently and unapologetically violating international law by their conquest for more land, they could never have my support.
1. I realized Christians were being persecuted and oppressed, and I choose to stand with them.
One of the ways Evangelicalism continues selling support for Israel is by painting this as a Muslim vs Jew situation– but that’s not reality. This is a situation of a violent, secular nation state, who is oppressing a group of people that include Christians.
Palestinians include both Muslims and Christians, and Christians are being just as persecuted as the rest of Palestinians. Israel has targeted Christian schools while Christians in the West remained silent. Christian churches and institutions have a long history of being burned and vandalized by the Israelis. Furthermore, Christians have lamented that the Israelis spit on them as they walk down the street, with many Christians ultimately accepting that being spat on in Israel is part of daily life. (Can you imagine if it were the Muslims doing that? Conservative leaders would be calling for war.)
And this is perhaps the top reason why I no longer support Israel: to do so would be a complete betrayal of my Christian brothers and sisters who suffer under anti-Christian persecution in Israel.
So, your pastor growing up taught you to support Israel.
I get it. Mine did too. As a result, I blindly supported Israel for many years– even to the point of voting for candidates I thought would be the most pro-Israel.
But now that I have set aside my bias, and been willing to consider the facts as they are, I realize I can’t support Israel and still be faithful to Jesus.

5 Reasons Why I’m A Christian Who Stopped Supporting Israel

BENJAMIN L. COREY : 5 Reasons Why I am A Christian Who Stopped Supporting Israel

BENJAMIN L. COREY: 5 Things I Wish Conservative Christians Understood About Muslims

BLC is an author, speaker, scholar, and global traveler, who holds graduate degrees in Theology & Intercultural Studies from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, and received his doctorate in Intercultural Studies from Fuller. He is the author of Undiluted: Rediscovering the Radical Message of Jesus, and Unafraid: Moving Beyond Fear-Based Faith.

Conservative Christians seem to have a lot of opinions about Islam and our Muslim neighbors.
Those opinions are often grossly misinformed at best.
I’ve met very few conservative Christians who have spent any considerable amount of time in friendships with Muslims; it’s also true that I’ve rarely met an overly anti-Islamic conservative Christian who has studied Islam beyond reading some sketchy articles on Facebook. The net result of this is the perpetuation of stereotype, misunderstanding, and outright bearing false witness against our Muslim neighbors both here and abroad.
Case in point is a recent post from Franklin Graham, which paints an entire religion with the broad brush of stereotype:
“Since 9/11, I have been warning America about the dangers of the teachings of Islam. Followers of Islam are taught very troubling passages that encourage them to murder and maim those they refer to infidels, or nonbelievers. With the internet and social media, radicalization is only increasing—and the dangers are continuing to increase. Many times, sadly, it is the young who are pulled into these teachings that encourage murder and rape in the name of the god of Islam. We saw the results again Saturday night in London with 7 killed and more than 48 wounded by Muslim men who said this was for Allah. That is three Islamic terror attacks in the country in less than three months. The threat of Islam is real. The threat of Islam is serious. The threat of Islam is dangerous. There is cause for concern, despite what some may say. We need to pray that God would give our President, our Congress, and our Senate wisdom—and the guts to do what is right for our nation, and not what’s politically correct. My prayer is that the United States—and the UK—will wake up before it’s too late.”
In light of how my conservative brothers and sisters so often spread stereotype and misinformation; having spent several years studying Islam in seminary, and having spent time in a Muslim context both in the U.S, and overseas (I’ve even gone to my local Mosque where I was welcomed hospitably), I find myself wishing conservative Christians understood these 5 things about Muslims:
1. Muslims love Jesus.
I don’t know how to make this more clear: you can’t be a good Muslim if you don’t love Jesus. Jesus is one of the most honored people in Islam, and the Quran affirms many of the key beliefs that orthodox Christians hold dear. As I stated in a previous article on Islam:
“Islam teaches that Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, that he never sinned, that he was full of the Holy Spirit, that he performed miracles including healing the sick and raising the dead, that he was a word of God, that the true Gospel was given to him, that he was miraculously taken up to heaven, that he is coming back one day to rule in peace and justice after slaying the antichrist, and that those who follow Jesus will be raised to Allah at the resurrection.”
That alone, along with our shared Scripture, makes Muslims more similar to us than any other world religion, including Judaism.
2. Muslims are some of the most hospitable people you’ll ever meet.
People often say to me, “Oh yeah, well go to an Islamic country and see how you’re treated.” The reality is I’ve done that and discovered that kindness and hospitality in the Muslim world far surpasses anything you’d experience in America. With all the things I was taught to fear about Muslims, the truth I discovered was that I have never experienced radical hospitality and kindness the way I do when I am among Muslims.
People who think Muslims are angry and full of hate have likely never met a Muslim, because when you do, they’ll often invite you over for dinner and treat you like an honored guest. Hospitality toward strangers is one of the most prominent attributes you’ll experience in the Muslim world.
3. Most Muslims do not view Christians or Jews as “infidels”, nor are they instructed to kill us.
The idea that Christians and Jews are “infidels” is inconsistent with mainstream Islam, and so is the idea that Muslims are to kill us. The Quran doesn’t refer to us as infidels (mushrikin) at all, but actually refers to us as “people of the book” (Ahl al-Kitab). Were a Muslim to call Christians or Jews infidels, this would place them outside of the mainstream. All religions have their extremists, but that doesn’t mean they represent the whole.
Moreover, the Quran doesn’t issue a blanket injunction to kill all unbelievers (mushrikin). Yes, it records some ancient warfare where mushrikin were to be killed, but this would be the equivalent to the Old Testament recording an injunction that Israel was to take the land and slaughter even the women and children who got in their way.
Disturbing? Certainly. But to act like the Quran teaches Muslims to slaughter all infidels today, would be the equivalent of saying that the Christian Bible commands us to slaughter and destroy anyone who is occupying the land of Israel, simply because we find that in the Old Testament. (Oh, wait- now that I think about that, we as Christians actually do often support that.)

4. Killing innocent people, and being a suicide bomber, are both actions that the Islamic religion forbids.

Does Islam teach it’s okay to kill innocent people? No, it doesn’t. In fact the Quran actually says this: “Whoso kills a soul, unless it be for murder or for wreaking corruption in the land, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind; and he who saves a life, it shall be as if he had given life to all mankind.”
Furthermore, the entire idea of being a suicide bomber as a way to martyrdom is at complete odds with Islam, as the Quran teaches that Muslims must not kill oneself (surah 4:29, and 2:195).
5. Muslims are most often the victims of terrorism.
If folks like Franklin Graham were correct, and if terrorism is all about Muslims hating us, we would expect to see “freedom-loving Christians” as being the typical victims of terrorism– but that’s not the case. The typical victims of terrorism are Muslims– we just don’t see it because seven people killed in London gets more air time than when 60 Muslims are blown up in Kabul.
Muslims, instead of being the average terrorist, are actually the average victims of terrorism.
We should be coming alongside our Muslim neighbors, we should grieve with them, and support them – because they are under attack from extremists more than anyone else.
For all the harsh and broad brush opinions on Muslims and the religion of Islam, it’s tragic that so many conservative Christians base their opinions on very little fact or first-hand knowledge or experience.
Having spent so much time studying Islam and spending time with real-life, flesh-and-blood Muslim neighbors, I grieve over that fact – because my Muslim neighbors are actually the kindest, most hospitable people I know.

5 Things I Wish Conservative Christians Understood About Muslims

BENJAMIN L. COREY: 5 Things I Wish Conservative Christians Understood About Muslims

2019 Ranking of US Billionaires

Ranking is based on world billionaires and not just US billionaires.
This list has only US billionaires. According to this list, US Jews who
are less 2% of US population make up 33% of US billionaires and
many of them rank way on the top.

Rank Name Billions Age Company Location
1 Jeff Bezos $131 B 55 Amazon United States
2 Bill Gates $96.5 B 64 Microsoft United States
3 Warren Buffett $82.5 B 89 Berkshire Hathaway United States
7 Larry Ellison $62.5 B 75 software United States
8 Mark Zuckerberg $62.3 B 35 Facebook United States
9 Michael Bloomberg $55.5 B 77 Bloomberg LP United States
10 Larry Page $50.8 B 46 Google United States
11 Charles Koch $50.5 B 84 Koch Industries United States
11 David Koch $50.5 B 79 Koch Industries United States
14 Sergey Brin $49.8 B 46 Google United States
16 Jim Walton $44.6 B 71 Walmart United States
17 Alice Walton $44.4 B 70 Walmart United States
18 Rob Walton $44.3 B 75 Walmart United States
19 Steve Ballmer $41.2 B 63 Microsoft United States
24 Sheldon Adelson $35.1 B 86 casinos United States
25 Michael Dell $34.3 B 54 Dell computers United States
26 Phil Knight $33.4 B 81 Nike United States
33 Jacqueline Mars $23.9 B 80 candy, pet food United States
33 John Mars $23.9 B 84 candy, pet food United States
40 Elon Musk $22.3 B 48 Tesla Motors United States
44 Jim Simons $21.5 B 81 hedge funds United States
52 Rupert Murdoch $19.4 B 88 newspapers, TV network United States
54 Laurene Powell Jobs $18.6 B 56 Apple, Disney United States
57 Ray Dalio $18.4 B 70 hedge funds United States
59 Len Blavatnik $17.7 B 62 diversified United States
61 Carl Icahn $17.4 B 83 investments United States
63 Thomas Peterffy $17.1 B 75 discount brokerage United States
68 Donald Bren $16.4 B 87 real estate United States
71 Abigail Johnson $15.6 B 57 money management United States
75 Lukas Walton $15.2 B 33 Walmart United States
82 Leonard Lauder $14.6 B 82 Estee Lauder United States
100 Stephen Schwarzman $13.2 B 72 investments United States
101 Eric Schmidt $12.9 B 64 Google United States
101 Steve Cohen $12.9 B 63 hedge funds United States
105 Harold Hamm $12.7 B 73 oil & gas United States
107 Thomas Frist, Jr. $12.4 B 81 hospitals United States
114 David Duffield $11.8 B 79 business software United States
114 Donald Newhouse $11.8 B 90 media United States
117 Ken Griffin $11.7 B 51 hedge funds United States
118 David Tepper $11.6 B 62 hedge funds United States
120 Pierre Omidyar $11.4 B 52 eBay, PayPal United States
122 Dustin Moskovitz $11.1 B 35 Facebook United States
128 Philip Anschutz $10.9 B 79 investments United States
133 John Menard, Jr. $10.5 B 79 home improvement stores United States
140 Gordon Moore $9.7 B 90 Intel United States
143 Charles Ergen $9.6 B 66 satellite TV United States
143 Jan Koum $9.6 B 43 WhatsApp United States
149 Ronald Perelman $9.4 B 76 leveraged buyouts United States
153 Blair Parry-Okeden $9.3 B 69 media, automotive United States
153 Jim Kennedy $9.3 B 71 media, automotive United States
158 Andrew Beal $9.1 B 66 banks, real estate United States
160 Hongbin Sun $9 B 56 real estate United States
162 James Goodnight $8.9 B 76 software United States
162 Micky Arison $8.9 B 70 Carnival Cruises United States
167 Stanley Kroenke $8.7 B 72 sports, real estate United States
178 Carl Cook $8.3 B 57 medical devices United States
178 Charles Schwab $8.3 B 82 discount brokerage United States
178 George Soros $8.3 B 89 hedge funds United States
187 David Geffen $7.8 B 76 movies, record labels United States
187 Edward Johnson, III. $7.8 B 89 money management United States
191 George Kaiser $7.6 B 77 oil & gas, banking United States
191 Stephen Ross $7.6 B 79 real estate United States
200 Herbert Kohler, Jr. $7.3 B 80 plumbing fixtures United States
203 Christy Walton $7.2 B 70 Walmart United States
203 John Malone $7.2 B 78 cable television United States
209 David Green $7 B 78 retail United States
209 David Shaw $7 B 68 hedge funds United States
209 Patrick Soon-Shiong $7 B 67 pharmaceuticals United States
209 Tom & Judy Love $7 B 82 retail & gas stations United States
215 John Doerr $6.9 B 68 venture capital United States
215 Pauline MacMillan Keinath $6.9 B 85 Cargill United States
215 Ralph Lauren $6.9 B 80 Ralph Lauren United States
215 Robert Pera $6.9 B 41 wireless networking gear United States
224 Hank & Doug Meijer $6.8 B supermarkets United States
224 Jerry Jones $6.8 B 77 Dallas Cowboys United States
224 Shahid Khan $6.8 B 69 auto parts United States

https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/;#version:static

2019 Ranking of US Billionaires

Palestinian youth shot in the back

Those without links means the link already appears above

1 Google Haaretz Israeli police officer shoots unarmed Palestinian in the back Link
2 Google TimesofIsrael Leaked footage shows border cop firing at unarmed  Palestinian Link
3 Google Reddit Non-threatening Palestinian man walking away from IDF shot with a Rubber bullet Link
4 Yandex Guardian Footage leaked of Israeli officer shooting Palestinian in the back Link
5 Yandex Scott.net Psychopathic violence: Video leaks of Israeli officer shooting Palestinian man in the back for fun as he follows orders Link
6 Yandex Independent Israeli soldier shoots unarmed Palestinian in the back, leaked footage shows Link
7 Yandex MiddleEasteye Leaked video shows Palestinian shot in back by Israeli police officer Link
8 yandex Telesurenglish Israeli Guard Shoots Unarmed Palestinian in the Back: Video Link
9 Yandex PressTv Video: Israeli police shooting unarmed Palestinian in the back for fun Link
10 Yandex Alarabia Israel opens probe after video shows unarmed Palestinian shot in back Link
11 Yandex Jpost Israel to decide soon whether to charge cop for shooting Palestinian man in the back Link
12 Yandex dailysabah Video of Israeli soldier shooting Palestinian youth sparks outrage on social media Link
13 Yandex Mehrnews A video has been circulating in social media showing Israeli regime’s soldiers shooting an unarmed Palestinian man at a checkpoint without any reason.
14 Bing pressTv
15 Bing dailysabah
16 Yahoo Israelhayom Israel may charge policewoman who shot Palestinian in back . Link
17 Yahoo Yahoo-news Israel may charge policewoman who shot Palestinian in back Link
18 Yahoo vosizneias Israel May Charge Policewoman Who Shot Palestinian In Back Link
19 Yahoo France24 Leaked footage shows Israeli police shooting unarmed Palestinian in the back Link
20 Yahoo Israelhayom
21 Yahoo alarabia
22 Yahoo vosizneias
Palestinian youth shot in the back

The Tragedy of the Yemeni Jews

2016 NYTimes Israeli Mystery of Lost Babies Gets New Chapter: 200,000 Secret Records Link
2016 YouTube  A Jewish mother who emigrated to Israel from Morocco in 1948 was told her baby died at childbirth but she believes her son was alive and given away. Link
2017 Haaretz $5,000 a Head’ Yemenite Babies Who Disappeared in 1950s Israel Were Sold to U.S. Jews Link
2018 The Guardian Israel agrees to open graves in search for ‘stolen babies Link
2018 TimesofIsrael Yemenite families of disappeared children file class-action lawsuit Link
2018 WRMEA The Dark Secret of Israel’s Stolen Babies Link
2018 YouTube Two Yemenite Sisters Reunited 67 Years Link
2019 NYTimes The Disappeared Children of Israel Link
2019 Haaretz Israel’s missing Yemenite kids were abducted, families believe Link
2019 Ynet Where are the abducted Yemenite children Link
2019 Ynet The Ethiopian babies who disappeared without a trace Link
2019 israelnationalnews Yemenite child ‘ordered’ before he was born Link
The Tragedy of the Yemeni Jews